Brock Turner's Parents: A Tale of Privilege and Entitlement


Brock Turner's Parents: A Tale of Privilege and Entitlement

In 2015, Brock Turner, a Stanford College pupil, was convicted of sexually assaulting an unconscious girl behind a dumpster. The case drew nationwide consideration and sparked outrage as a result of lenient sentence Turner acquired: six months in county jail and three years of probation.

Throughout the trial, Turner’s mother and father, Dan and Carryl Turner, made a number of public statements that additional infected the general public’s anger. They expressed sympathy for his or her son and criticized the sufferer, arguing that she was partially liable for the assault as a result of she had been ingesting. Their feedback had been extensively condemned as victim-blaming and insensitive.

The Turner mother and father’ habits throughout the trial and within the aftermath has led to a lot dialogue in regards to the position of privilege and entitlement within the felony justice system. Some have argued that the Turners’ wealth and social standing allowed them to downplay the seriousness of their son’s crime and to attenuate the hurt he had prompted.

brock turner mother and father

Rich, privileged, and entitled.

  • Sufferer-blaming.
  • Insensitive feedback.
  • Downplayed son’s crime.
  • Minimized sufferer’s hurt.
  • Lack of accountability.
  • Perpetuation of rape tradition.
  • Image of injustice.
  • Catalyst for change.
  • Reminder of privilege’s position in justice.

The Brock Turner mother and father’ habits has sparked a nationwide dialog about sexual assault, victim-blaming, and the position of privilege within the felony justice system.

Sufferer-blaming.

Sufferer-blaming is a standard and dangerous response to sexual assault. It entails inserting the blame for the assault on the sufferer, somewhat than on the perpetrator. This may take many varieties, similar to suggesting that the sufferer was “asking for it” by dressing provocatively, or that they need to have been extra cautious to keep away from being assaulted.

Within the case of Brock Turner, his mother and father engaged in victim-blaming by suggesting that the sufferer was partially liable for the assault as a result of she had been ingesting. It is a basic instance of victim-blaming, because it shifts the main target away from the perpetrator’s actions and onto the sufferer’s habits.

Sufferer-blaming is dangerous as a result of it retraumatizes the sufferer and makes it much less seemingly that they may come ahead and report the assault. It additionally sends the message that sexual assault is someway the sufferer’s fault, which may make it harder for victims to heal and transfer on.

The Turner mother and father’ victim-blaming feedback had been significantly egregious as a result of they had been made in a public discussion board, throughout their son’s trial. This gave their feedback a wider viewers and made them much more dangerous to the sufferer.

Sufferer-blaming isn’t acceptable. It is very important keep in mind that sexual assault isn’t the sufferer’s fault. In the event you or somebody you understand has been sexually assaulted, there are sources obtainable to assist.

Insensitive feedback.

Along with their victim-blaming feedback, Brock Turner’s mother and father additionally made plenty of different insensitive and hurtful remarks.

  • They in contrast their son’s assault to “a nasty evening out.”

    This remark trivializes the seriousness of sexual assault and fails to acknowledge the lasting hurt that it could actually trigger.

  • They stated that their son “made a mistake.”

    This assertion means that sexual assault is a minor offense, somewhat than a severe crime.

  • They expressed extra concern for his or her son’s future than for the sufferer’s well-being.

    It is a clear indication of the place their priorities lie.

  • They advised that the sufferer was someway liable for the assault as a result of she was intoxicated.

    It is a basic instance of victim-blaming.

The Turner mother and father’ insensitive feedback prompted additional ache and outrage for the sufferer and her supporters. In addition they demonstrated an entire lack of expertise in regards to the seriousness of sexual assault and the influence it could actually have on victims.